Re: Faruz Karsenti

2004-03-08 Thread Robert Talbott
thanks joan (and heidi yossi). At 08:31 AM 3/8/2004 -0500, you wrote: This author exists in pre-MARC cataloging under the heading Karsenti, Faruz, d. 1846. There's another author in the NAF who was established as Karsenti from a roman source. Considering these, I would not have hesitated to

Ke-minhag Italyani

2004-03-08 Thread Yossi Galron
I have a prayer book: Sefer Tahanunim u-selihot : le-lele ashmorot ke-minhag Italyani (Venice, 1760) Should the Uniform-title (130) be: Selihot (Italy) Should I create a record in the authority file? Is this one the same as: LCCN 2001-419429 (there is no authority record for Selihot (North

Re: Ke-minhag Italyani

2004-03-08 Thread Joan C Biella
Selihot (Italy) sounds okay to me, on the understanding that there is actually something unique about this collection of Selihot that warrants a unique uniform title. Yes, you may create a NAR. We often don't create them for 130s unless it is necessary to trace references. When you say, is this

Re: Ke-minhag Italyani

2004-03-08 Thread Heidi G. Lerner
Would we want to use the qualifier (Roman rite) although this does not follow the models for other compendia of Selihot. Heidi At 01:28 PM 3/8/2004 -0500, you wrote: Selihot (Italy) sounds okay to me, on the understanding that there is actually something unique about this collection of Selihot