Re: [Heb-NACO] [EXT] - Re: 046 Hebrew date coding in NARs

2021-04-27 Thread Shinohara, Jasmin via Heb-naco
Dear friends, I’d like to thank you for participating in this discussion. We’ve heard back from LC, who after consulting with our colleagues in the IJ section, has reconsidered. This is the guidance the IJ section shared: For a specific day, follow the Gregorian calendar equivalent provided on

Re: [Heb-NACO] [EXT] - Re: 046 Hebrew date coding in NARs

2021-04-27 Thread Robert M. TALBOTT via Heb-naco
Thank you for the clarification, Jasmin. On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 12:10 PM Shinohara, Jasmin wrote: > Dear friends, > > > > I’d like to thank you for participating in this discussion. We’ve heard > back from LC, who after consulting with our colleagues in the IJ section, > has reconsidered. This

Re: [Heb-NACO] [EXT] - Re: 046 Hebrew date coding in NARs

2021-04-27 Thread Ahava Cohen via Heb-naco
Yossi cited our old work practice of 5000 and adding 1240, so I thought I'd chime in with NLI's current policy within our authority database – like the recommendation which started this thread, if all we have is a Hebrew date we do code the two possible dates in 046. It takes an extra few second