Re: [Heb-NACO] Bencher/birkon classifcation

2024-02-16 Thread Miller, Caroline via Heb-naco
, Jeremiah Aaron ; heb-naco Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] Bencher/birkon classifcation Hi Aaron and Edie, That helped tremendously! Thanks for taking the time to explain all of that. Based on the table construction, I was under the impression that all rites aside from Ashkenazi are considered "non-tradit

Re: [Heb-NACO] Bencher/birkon classifcation

2024-02-15 Thread Lili Brown via Heb-naco
tively, it could be any appropriate entity that you choose to enter in the 7xx field. I hope this helps. Best, Aaron and Edie From: Heb-naco On Behalf Of Lili Brown via Heb-naco Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2024 5:36 PM To: heb-naco Subject: [Heb-NACO] Bencher/birkon classifcation

Re: [Heb-NACO] Bencher/birkon classifcation

2024-02-15 Thread Taub, Jeremiah Aaron via Heb-naco
helps. Best, Aaron and Edie From: Heb-naco On Behalf Of Lili Brown via Heb-naco Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2024 5:36 PM To: heb-naco Subject: [Heb-NACO] Bencher/birkon classifcation CAUTION: This email message has been received from an external source. Please use caution when opening

[Heb-NACO] Bencher/birkon classifcation

2024-02-14 Thread Lili Brown via Heb-naco
Hi all, I'm working with a colleague of mine here to catalog a Turkish-Ladino birkon and I'm seeking a bit of advice for constructing the call number. It seems that BM675.G7 is where this item should be classed, specifically BM675.G7Z67-.G7Z679 (Non-traditional rites, Other. By editor or instit