At 21:20 +0200 2005/04/27, Marcus Holland-Moritz wrote:
%destructor looks like it has the ability to be this "something
better", but IMO it currently isn't as good as it could be (i.e.
it is worse than my solution with regard to potential memory
leaks arising from parser stack overflow).
The intent
On 2005-04-27, at 01:55:22 +0200, Hans Aberg wrote:
> At 00:09 +0200 2005/04/27, Marcus Holland-Moritz wrote:
> >On 2005-04-26, at 23:46:10 +0200, Hans Aberg wrote:
> >
> >> Again, this is probably a question for Paul to answer, who wrote the
> >> current C-parser. I thought that the C-parser wa
