Re: %destructor feedback

2005-10-21 Thread Frank Heckenbach
Joel E. Denny wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Frank Heckenbach wrote: > > > Akim Demaille wrote: > > > >> Maybe that does not deserve that much attention: it seems pretty weird > >> not to use a value. A warning seems a better feature. > > > > I sometimes attach some kinds of flags (integer type)

Re: %destructor feedback

2005-10-21 Thread Joel E. Denny
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Frank Heckenbach wrote: Akim Demaille wrote: Maybe that does not deserve that much attention: it seems pretty weird not to use a value. A warning seems a better feature. I sometimes attach some kinds of flags (integer type) to some symbols that I need in some, but not a

Re: %destructor feedback

2005-10-21 Thread Akim Demaille
>>> "Wolfgang" == Wolfgang Spraul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Akim - >> We need no %destructor-param etc., we need to fix yydestructor and >> yysymprint so that %parse-param are passed to them, just like yyerror. > That would be perfectly fine for me. As a matter of fact, the documentation