On Sun, 9 Jul 2006, Akim Demaille wrote:
> I'd like to see its
> destructor called, just as in glr.
I'll implement whatever we decide for glr.c. Maybe someone else can
handle yacc.c?
> As a matter of fact, I have considered adding a BOF in complement of
> EOF: it seems that this token would al
Le 9 juil. 06 à 17:17, Joel E. Denny a écrit :
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006, Akim Demaille wrote:
A friend of mine was using END in his grammars in a very specific
place (he was making error recovery right before END), that's why
I didn't disable it. Sure, it's wrong to play with it, but quickly
enoug
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006, Akim Demaille wrote:
> A friend of mine was using END in his grammars in a very specific
> place (he was making error recovery right before END), that's why
> I didn't disable it. Sure, it's wrong to play with it, but quickly
> enough you have a grammar that generates an empty
