On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Joel E. Denny wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Jeff Inman wrote:
>
> > It seems wrong to me that the second set of "%{ ... %}", after a "%union{
> > ...}", should insert
> > into the tab.cpp file, instead of into the tab.hpp file. I want to make
> > more
> > declarations
> > th
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Jeff Inman wrote:
> It seems wrong to me that the second set of "%{ ... %}", after a "%union{
> ...}", should insert
> into the tab.cpp file, instead of into the tab.hpp file. I want to make more
> declarations
> that depend on the type produced by the union.
I definitely ag
Hi folks,
I'm running bison 2.3 on OSX 10.4.8
It seems wrong to me that the second set of "%{ ... %}", after a "%
union{ ...}", should insert
into the tab.cpp file, instead of into the tab.hpp file. I want to
make more declarations
that depend on the type produced by the union. It seems to
[I'm sorry for cross-posting but I think this might concern both lists]
Hello,
I've generated a C++ Parser and C++ Scanner with bison 2.3 and flex
2.5.33 respectively.
They are both prefixed with smt in my case. I've been also having a
hard time to use both together without trouble and unfortuna
