I'm trying to reply to a message archived by help-bison twice but that I
never received in my inbox:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-bison/2006-12/index.html
What's worse, my attempts to reply have been rejected as "stock spam".
So, my reply is attached.On Tue, 5 Dec 20006, Hans Aberg
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Hans Aberg wrote:
> On 4 Dec 2006, at 22:56, Joel E. Denny wrote:
>
> > > The problem is that different languages use different paradigms, and it
> > > m,ay
> > > not be possible to do this stuff in that context then.
> >
> > Until we know what those languages are, I'm not su
On 4 Dec 2006, at 22:59, Joel E. Denny wrote:
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 4 Dec 2006, at 20:01, Joel E. Denny wrote:
Well, maybe I'm wasting your time, but I hope that helps you to
get a
better feel for the names than my original post did.
I think you need to explain these m
On 4 Dec 2006, at 22:59, Joel E. Denny wrote:
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 4 Dec 2006, at 20:01, Joel E. Denny wrote:
Well, maybe I'm wasting your time, but I hope that helps you to
get a
better feel for the names than my original post did.
I think you need to explain these m
On 4 Dec 2006, at 22:56, Joel E. Denny wrote:
The problem is that different languages use different paradigms,
and it m,ay
not be possible to do this stuff in that context then.
Until we know what those languages are, I'm not sure how to handle
them.
So then you cannot produce a unified
