On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Joel E. Denny wrote:
> > Well, if we document how the splitting is done, then I figure they can't
> > complain too much. I certainly don't want to see Bison parse complex C++
> > constructs. Let the C++ compiler catch those errors.
>
> Wouldn't it
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Hans Aberg wrote:
> > It also occurs to me now that a leading "::" is not completely redundant.
> > The given namespace is used in two ways: for declarations and for
> > references. The former needs the splitting we discussed. I think the
> > latter would use the given namesp
On 1 Oct 2007, at 20:46, Joel E. Denny wrote:
Should we accept a leading ::?
I think so. I see it as redundant but not erroneous.
So I thought first, but it implies a name relative the global
namespace. So if
the Bison generated parser file is included in a namespace, like in:
namespac
Hello again!
I want to ask what the current state of the GRL C++
skeleton is. I had no trouble compiling lalr1.cc
but grl.cc seems to be different. Can anybody give
me a brief overview or a link to more information?
Thank you!
Sebastian
___
help-
Joel E. Denny wrote:
Well, if we document how the splitting is done, then I figure they can't
complain too much. I certainly don't want to see Bison parse complex C++
constructs. Let the C++ compiler catch those errors.
Wouldn't it be both easy and powerful to solve that namespace thing
usin
Joel E. Denny wrote:
If we start "parsing" namespace names, we will have a million
new questions to answer. What is the output of "::foo",
I figured the namespace name is meant to be relative to the global
namespace, so a leading "::" is implicit if not specified.
I'm not sure if this is tr
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Hans Aberg wrote:
> On 1 Oct 2007, at 03:10, Joel E. Denny wrote:
>
> > > Should we accept a leading ::?
> >
> > I think so. I see it as redundant but not erroneous.
>
> So I thought first, but it implies a name relative the global namespace. So if
> the Bison generated par
Joel E. Denny wrote:
>> (1) %prefix=abc renames function yylex to "abclex"
>> instead of putting it in namespace abc.
>
> You can write:
>
> %name-prefix="abc::"
> %define "namespace" "abc"
Works like a charm, thank you!
Sebastian
___
help-
On 1 Oct 2007, at 03:10, Joel E. Denny wrote:
Should we accept a leading ::?
I think so. I see it as redundant but not erroneous.
So I thought first, but it implies a name relative the global
namespace. So if the Bison generated parser file is included in a
namespace, like in:
namesp
