Le 12 janv. 2010 à 04:17, Peng Yu a écrit : > In Levine' flex & bison book, it mentioned "As should be apparent by > now, the C++ support in bison is nowhere near as mature as the C > support,..." on page 241 (Chapter 9).
Well, one of the two has been existing for about thirty years :) > I'm still learning bison and haven't finish reading all the previous > chapters. Could somebody point to me explicitly in what aspects C++ > support is not as mature as C support? I confess that sometimes the interface changes slightly. And we have less experience about portability issues. But I have been using it personally for years, and it works. > Are there any features that C++ support is better than C support? (I > know C++ location is better according to the book, anything else?) Well, being C++ is already something better than being C. For instance the current version in the repository supports objects as semantical values, which means you can rely on the destructors and so forth. _______________________________________________ help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
