Re: Disappearance of rhs[], prhs[], and user control of table generation.

2011-04-06 Thread John P. Hartmann
E.g., taking the tables to an architecture where there is no native Bison. On 6 April 2011 21:06, Akim Demaille wrote: > > hi all, > > I would really like to know more about your uses of Bison.  What kind of use > can require these tables? > > Cheers, > >        Akim > > ___

Re: Disappearance of rhs[], prhs[], and user control of table generation.

2011-04-06 Thread Akim Demaille
hi all, I would really like to know more about your uses of Bison. What kind of use can require these tables? Cheers, Akim ___ help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison

Re: Disappearance of rhs[], prhs[], and user control of table generation.

2011-04-06 Thread John P. Hartmann
I need to weigh in here too. I use Bison in "table-only" mode. Any change in the table structure would require me to make a corresponding change in my post processor. Any radical change would mean that I would be stuck with a downlevel Bison. On 6 April 2011 14:35, David M. Warme wrote: > > Bi

Disappearance of rhs[], prhs[], and user control of table generation.

2011-04-06 Thread David M. Warme
Bison developers, While examining the "git" repository for bison, I discovered a change that will be very detrimental to our particular application that makes extensive use of bison. The relevant change is discussed here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2008-11/msg00291.html We