On 1 Nov 2012, at 18:34, Akim Demaille wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> Le 31 oct. 2012 à 15:47, Hans Aberg a écrit :
>
>> It is pointless in UTF-8, and accepting it encourages a number of other
>> problems.
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_order_mark
>
> You are right that Bison wants at least to b
On 1 Nov 2012, at 18:34, Akim Demaille wrote:
> Hi Hans,
Hi Akim,
> Le 31 oct. 2012 à 15:47, Hans Aberg a écrit :
>
>> It is pointless in UTF-8, and accepting it encourages a number of other
>> problems.
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_order_mark
>
> You are right that Bison wants at le
Hi Hans,
Le 31 oct. 2012 à 15:47, Hans Aberg a écrit :
> It is pointless in UTF-8, and accepting it encourages a number of other
> problems.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_order_mark
You are right that Bison wants at least to be able to read
the ASCII part of the 8 bits, so that sort-of
Le 1 nov. 2012 à 14:48, Paul Eggert a écrit :
> On 10/31/2012 10:04 AM, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> How about this?
>
> Thanks, I pushed that into gnulib,
> with a minor tweak to the ChangeLog entry.
Thanks!
I installed the following patch in branch-2.6 (and a few
uninteresting minor changes).
co
On 10/31/2012 10:04 AM, Akim Demaille wrote:
> How about this?
Thanks, I pushed that into gnulib,
with a minor tweak to the ChangeLog entry.
___
help-bison@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
Le 31 oct. 2012 à 18:04, Akim Demaille a écrit :
> Le 31 oct. 2012 à 17:24, Paul Eggert a écrit :
>
>> I suppose there should be a quote_mem or something like that.
>
> How about this?
>
> (the context for gnulibers:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-bison/2012-10/msg00017.html)
>
> co
