On 6 Feb 2013, at 11:32, John P. Hartmann wrote:
> Isn't the point that <> are brackets (parentheses) in this context.
> Clearly the lexer must determine this and emit an appropriate token.
The ">>" token is context dependent, so the parser might set that context in a
variable which the lexer r
What if you let the lexer emit the SHL token and have your grammar
accept '>' tokens or SHL tokens for closing template lists? The action
would check if SHL closed the template list and issue a call to the
lexer telling it to flush its input and insert another '>' token.
-- john
On Wed, Feb 6, 20
Isn't the point that <> are brackets (parentheses) in this context.
Clearly the lexer must determine this and emit an appropriate token.
On 6 February 2013 10:14, Hans Aberg wrote:
> On 6 Feb 2013, at 00:54, Adam Smalin wrote:
>
>> This doesn't help :( I see >> is in the lexer (search SHL) which
On 6 Feb 2013, at 00:54, Adam Smalin wrote:
> This doesn't help :( I see >> is in the lexer (search SHL) which means
> List> will not compile because >> is a right shift. But i looked in
> the y file first and well... like i said its a C++ problem so C++ obviously
> would suffer from it.
Have
On 05/02/2013 23:54, Adam Smalin wrote:
This doesn't help :( I see >> is in the lexer (search SHL) which means
List> will not compile because >> is a right shift. But i looked
in the y file first and well... like i said its a C++ problem so C++
obviously would suffer from it.
Why have you got a
