Le 5 avr. 2013 à 01:25, Adam Smalin a écrit :
> I believe %prec is what I want but it DOESN'T do what I want. I don't
> understand what it actually does. Why isn't it making the below the same?
>
> | rval '<' '<' rval %prec LSHIFT
> | rval LSHIFT' rval
>
> It doesn't seem to change the precede
Still wrong. I can do >> and << in the lexer but the problem is... lets
take this for example
List>Foo. I need to see >> as two > so it can reduce twice.
However
listVar>Foo This needs to do intVar3>>Foo before
comparing with intVar2 to be correct so precedence difference between >>
and > is neede
On 4 Apr 2013, at 14:48, Akim Demaille wrote:
> Le 3 avr. 2013 à 20:28, Hans Aberg a écrit :
>
>> On 3 Apr 2013, at 04:52, Adam Smalin wrote:
>>
>>> ... I have no idea how i can fix this without rewriting it all.
>>
>> Have you tried getting the lexer to emit two '>' when it sees a ">>", say
Le 3 avr. 2013 à 20:28, Hans Aberg a écrit :
> On 3 Apr 2013, at 04:52, Adam Smalin wrote:
>
>> ... I have no idea how i can fix this without rewriting it all.
>
>
> Have you tried getting the lexer to emit two '>' when it sees a ">>", say by
> using an parenthesis-matching integer count?
On 4 Apr 2013, at 01:49, Adam Smalin wrote:
> The problem is my bison file having different precedence for '>' '>' than '>'
> even though they are right next to eachother its still incorrect to treat >>
> the same precedence as >
It will be fixed by the lexer, so the precedence problem will no
