[Please cc the list.]
On 18 Dec 2013, at 23:45, Adam Smalin wrote:
> >The token precedences apply to the tokens immediately before and after the
> >parsing ‘.’ (as in the .output file) in the shift/reduce conflicting rules.
> >The grammar must be written so that the tokens appear in such a pos
[Please cc the list.]
On 18 Dec 2013, at 11:05, John P. Hartmann wrote:
> Isn't the grammar context sensitive? No way that can be shoehorned into
> LALR(1).
Computer languages are typically context sensitive, but that is pushed into the
actions.
[Please avoid styled text.]
On 18 Dec 2013, at 02:05, Adam Smalin wrote:
> I don't believe that works. According to my rules and the conflict files it
> REFUSES to shift. "var, var = var" I think will work but "var = var, var"
> will be seen as rval ',' rval which isn't legal. I'm not sure whe
