On 27 Jun 2014, at 14:40, Christian Schoenebeck
wrote:
> 1. Strong separation between "lexer" and "parser" has its historical
> reasons, but it makes things often quite problematic.
Bison is synced in the first hand with Flex, but the latter does not currently
belong to the GNU
On Wednesday 25 June 2014 23:00:10 Hans Aberg wrote:
> If you want your interpreter to read and interact token-by-token, then you
> should use the push parser. If you further want to show correct token
> completions, then an LR(1) parser should be used: the Bison default is
> LALR(1), which has sta
