Re: Co-Maintainer

Hey, I just said I'm not the volunteer and there's nothing at all hard to understand about what I just said. A volunteer came in and said they had a bachelor's degree. No one pointed to them anything helpful at all about how they could help. They probably don't know how your organization is struct

Re: Co-Maintainer

I still don't understand what you are writing and where you want to go with this. Anyway if you, as you stated, have no background whatsoever on the software that you are offering to maintain, and if you are not even willing to join the bug tracker, then I'm afraid you have zero qualifications t

Re: Co-Maintainer

Hey, I didn't volunteer, just that I bet that the volunteer doesn't even see or know about the difference. In any case, that looked like a possible penetration test event. No one just should just give permissions away without authentication - I didn't know he was asking for that. I just thought it

Re: Co-Maintainer

I think you are confusing the roles of "contributor" and "maintainer".     Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2018 at 8:49 PM From: "Kenneth Adam Miller" To: laure...@mail.com Cc: a...@lrde.epita.fr, help-bison@gnu.org, james@pentest.nz Subject: Re: Co-Maintainer I know that's what I thought. Some v

Re: Co-Maintainer

I know that's what I thought. Some volunteer just came in with their valuable time and got turned away. GNU is a free software organization - part of their life blood is volunteers. Just because someone doesn't have a background in that particular thing doesn't mean they should be dismissed. On Sa

Re: error invalid directive: '%param'

Hi! > Le 30 nov. 2015 à 14:50, spar...@email.it a écrit : > > Hi, > I'm trying to build an application called kregexpeditor but 'make' fails > with the following error: > > [ 1%] [BISON][qregexpparser] Building parser with bison 2.7.12-4996 > qregexpparser.y:94.1-6: error: invalid directive: '%

Re: Co-Maintainer

Is this sarcastic? Is this a passive-aggressive way to say something? I don't really understand the message.     Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2018 at 9:01 AM From: "Kenneth Adam Miller" To: a...@lrde.epita.fr Cc: help-bison@gnu.org, james@pentest.nz Subject: Re: Co-Maintainer Yeah, we just hav

Re: Is C++ Variant Considered Stable?

> Le 28 juin 2017 à 23:14, Simon Richter a écrit : > > Hi, > > On 28.06.2017 21:33, David McCallum wrote: > >> Are there changes pending for variant that might break my parser somewhere >> down the road? Or is it considered safe to use? > > Presumably, neither, as I haven't seen any feedback

Re: Why is there this warning?

Hi! > Le 2 sept. 2016 à 18:42, Balaco Baco a écrit : > > Take the file [file.y], compile it to generate tab.[ch] files and the compile > it (without linking) with gcc. It gives a warning in this step. Can fix this > warning? > > Commands used and their output: > > > $ bison -vd file.y >

Re: Co-Maintainer

Yeah, we just have too much of that 50$ an hour labor here lying around. No need to just adopt someone else's free hours and enthusiasm, no matter how small the favor is. I have some thing like 20 different research ideas and small helpful tasks that I could just write about in the space of 15 min

Re: Bison 3.0.4 manual section 3.7.6 question

Hi! > Le 15 févr. 2016 à 01:31, Gary L Peskin a écrit : > > In the Bison 3.0.4 manual in section 3.7.6 on destructors, the example > shows: > > %union { char *string; } > %token STRING1 STRING2 > %type string1 string2 > %union { char character; } > %token CHR > %type chr > %token T

Re: [sr #108339] ICC wargings in generated files

Hi! > Le 17 juil. 2013 à 21:08, Maxim Prohorenko a écrit : > > URL: > > > Details: > > icc: .bison.cpp(2086): warning #161: unrecognized #pragma > > GCC paragmas unrecognized in icc: > > #if defined __GNUC__ && 407 <= __GNUC__ * 100 + __GNUC_MINOR__