Re: GLR ambiguity

2007-06-18 Thread Alessandro Di Marco
Hans Aberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On 16 Jun 2007, at 08:15, Paul Hilfinger wrote: > >> On 14 Jun 2007, at 12:48, Alessandro Di Marco wrote: >> I was trying to create a GLR grammar for natural languages >> ...when I stuck on the >> followi

Re: GLR ambiguity

2007-06-14 Thread Alessandro Di Marco
Hans Aberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On 14 Jun 2007, at 14:46, Alessandro Di Marco wrote: > In american english sentences like the following ones are > quite common: > > 1) "blah blah blah". Some more blah... > 2) "blah blah blah."

Re: GLR ambiguity

2007-06-14 Thread Alessandro Di Marco
Tim Van Holder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alessandro Di Marco wrote: > text: > /* empty */ >| text sentence >; > > sentence: > WORD EOL >| DOUBLEQ WORD EOL >| DOUBLEQ WORD EOL DOUBLEQ >; Well,

Re: GLR ambiguity

2007-06-14 Thread Alessandro Di Marco
OK, I forgot the attachment. Moreover, the below ambiguity arises with the string: /"hello." people./ (without '/'). sorry. Alessandro demo.tgz Description: Binary data Alessandro Di Marco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi all. I was trying to create a GLR gra

GLR ambiguity

2007-06-14 Thread Alessandro Di Marco
Hi all. I was trying to create a GLR grammar for natural languages when I stuck on the following s/r ambiguity. Ambiguity detected. Option 1, text -> text -> text sentence -> DOUBLEQ WORD EOL sentence -> DOUBLEQ WORD EOL