Akim -
> Could you please confirm that the appended patch (committed)
> does address your issue?
>
> Index: ChangeLog
> * data/c.m4 (b4_yydestruct_generate, b4_yysymprint_generate): Pass
> the %parse-params.
> ...
Please excuse the delay.
Your patch didn't cleanly apply to the bison-2
ge this, then I could
retire my sed fix.
Regards,
Wolfgang
On Thursday 20 October 2005 18:38, you wrote:
> >>> "Wolfgang" == Wolfgang Spraul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Akim -
>
> Hey,
>
> >> I'm not sure about %param-dest
Akim -
> I'm not sure about %param-destructor, it is not very clean, but just
> like there is %initial-action, we could introduce a %final-action
> always run when leaving yyparse (whether on failure or not).
When you say %param-destructor, do you mean the %destructor-param I was
talking about?
Joel -
> Are you now talking about a YYCLEANUP macro or YYABORT_CLEANUP and
> YYERROR_CLEANUP macros?
>
> If you mean YYCLEANUP, it would need to return. Would a function call be
> too inefficient?
Sorry, I made a mistake here. You are right - if YYCLEANUP is a goto, then it
cannot return. Sure
fer more cleanup flexibility (macros)
Regards,
Wolfgang
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 05:26, you wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Wolfgang Spraul wrote:
> >>>>Note that in the future, Bison might also consider that right hand
> >>>>side members that are not m
nc2($2); YYABORT; }
in bison 2.1, it now looks like this:
if (error) YYABORT;
Thanks for your detailed comments, I found them very helpful!
Best Regards,
Wolfgang
On Monday 17 October 2005 19:21, you wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Wolfgang Spraul wrote:
> > the reason I prefer the aut
On Monday 17 October 2005 08:34, Joel E. Denny wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Wolfgang Spraul wrote:
> > Let's say you have an action that gets an object passed in which has a
> > destructor. When using YYABORT inside the action, the destructor for this
> > object is always c
Under %destructor, the bison 2.1 manual says:
"this feature is still experimental, as there has not been enough user
feedback."
Well, I can help with that: I am using %destructor for a while now and I like
it. It works well. One problem I have is that there is no %destructor-param
same as the
