On 10 Apr 2007, at 15:59, Rob Quill wrote:
Did I imagine it, or did I read somewhere that one of the suggested
improvements of Bison was to make it produce LR(1) parsers,
Yes.
as LALR(1)
is used because they produce smaller tables, but now the memory
restriction is not so great, it is not as
Hi,
Did I imagine it, or did I read somewhere that one of the suggested
improvements of Bison was to make it produce LR(1) parsers, as LALR(1)
is used because they produce smaller tables, but now the memory
restriction is not so great, it is not as necessary to use LALR?
Thanks.
Rob
_
