Re: Conflicts in large grammar

2007-08-09 Thread Alfonso Urdaneta
Hans Aberg wrote: What are the cons and pros of the two? Mac OS X 10.4.10 comes with CVS but not the other, so that one is easier for me. svn lets you rename / move files without losing history. This is huge. svn lets you group files for actions, i.e. if you check in 900 files, and one fail

Re: Conflicts in large grammar

2007-08-09 Thread Evan Lavelle
Hans Aberg wrote: On 9 Aug 2007, at 10:55, Evan Lavelle wrote: http://savannah.gnu.org/svn/?group=bison "Error: this project has turned off this tool" ?! I sympathise. If I ever get enough time, I'll probably be converting back from svn to cvs. What are the cons and pros of the two? Mac

Re: Conflicts in large grammar

2007-08-09 Thread Hans Aberg
On 9 Aug 2007, at 10:55, Evan Lavelle wrote: http://savannah.gnu.org/svn/?group=bison "Error: this project has turned off this tool" ?! I sympathise. If I ever get enough time, I'll probably be converting back from svn to cvs. What are the cons and pros of the two? Mac OS X 10.4.10 come

Re: Conflicts in large grammar

2007-08-09 Thread Evan Lavelle
Hans Aberg wrote: http://savannah.gnu.org/svn/?group=bison "Error: this project has turned off this tool" ?! I sympathise. If I ever get enough time, I'll probably be converting back from svn to cvs. Evan ___ help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.g

Re: Conflicts in large grammar

2007-08-08 Thread Hans Aberg
On 8 Aug 2007, at 22:50, Alfonso Urdaneta wrote: The Bison from the CVS works fine, too. :-) they haven't switched to svn yet? You might try http://savannah.gnu.org/cvs/?group=bison http://savannah.gnu.org/svn/?group=bison http://subversions.gnu.org/ for comparison. :-) Hans Aberg

Re: Conflicts in large grammar

2007-08-08 Thread Alfonso Urdaneta
Hans Aberg wrote: The Bison from the CVS works fine, too. :-) they haven't switched to svn yet? -- alfonso e. urdaneta _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of

Re: Conflicts in large grammar

2007-08-08 Thread Laurence Finston
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Hans Aberg wrote: > On 8 Aug 2007, at 14:20, Laurence Finston wrote: > > The Bison from the CVS works fine, too. :-) > That's a good idea, thanks. I didn't think of doing that. As long as I had to install it locally, I might as well keep up with the development versions.

Re: Conflicts in large grammar

2007-08-08 Thread Hans Aberg
On 8 Aug 2007, at 14:20, Laurence Finston wrote: I've now determined that using a more recent version of Bison helps. I was using 1.875. I added a rule that caused Bison to abort and then tried it with 2.1, which succeeded. I ran both versions using input that didn't cause 1.875 to fail

Re: Conflicts in large grammar

2007-08-08 Thread Laurence Finston
I've now determined that using a more recent version of Bison helps. I was using 1.875. I added a rule that caused Bison to abort and then tried it with 2.1, which succeeded. I ran both versions using input that didn't cause 1.875 to fail and the number of shift/reduce conflicts differed. I'

Re: Conflicts in large grammar

2007-08-06 Thread lfinsto1
> feel free to send me a copy and I will try to see if I can help you. Thank you very much for your offer. The package is quite large, so it would best to download it. Instructions on downloading the source files from the repository at the GNU Project's Savannah website can be found here: http:/

Re: Conflicts in large grammar

2007-08-05 Thread henrik . sorensen
On Sunday 05 August 2007 15:18, Laurence Finston wrote: > On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, Hans Aberg wrote: > > When I tried it, it worked: > > $ bison parser.y++ > > parser.y++: conflicts: 455 shift/reduce, 1 reduce/reduce I got the same. > > I never upload non-working versions. If I have a similar question

Re: Conflicts in large grammar

2007-08-05 Thread Laurence Finston
On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, Hans Aberg wrote: > When I tried it, it worked: > $ bison parser.y++ > parser.y++: conflicts: 455 shift/reduce, 1 reduce/reduce I never upload non-working versions. If I have a similar question again, I'll upload examples to an ftp server. Sorry for the inconvenience this ti

Re: Conflicts in large grammar

2007-08-05 Thread Hans Aberg
On 5 Aug 2007, at 09:47, Laurence Finston wrote: Since the files are rather large, did you considering provide a URL instead. The relevant source code is here: http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/3dldf/3dldf/Group/CWEB/ (a subdirectory of the CVS repository for GNU 3DLDF) It contains the fil

Re: Conflicts in large grammar

2007-08-05 Thread Laurence Finston
On Sat, 4 Aug 2007, Hans Aberg wrote: > Since the files are rather large, did you considering provide a URL instead. The relevant source code is here: http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/3dldf/3dldf/Group/CWEB/ (a subdirectory of the CVS repository for GNU 3DLDF) It contains the files `parser.ou

Re: Conflicts in large grammar

2007-08-04 Thread Hans Aberg
On 3 Aug 2007, at 16:49, Laurence Finston wrote: I've run into a problem with the grammar of GNU 3DLDF. It's rather large, and I believe that's part of the problem, so it's not possible to provide a minimal example. I tried to attached the debugging output files from three runs of Bison in a