Akim and Bison fans,
> I would really like to know more about your uses of Bison.
> What kind of use can require these tables (yyrhs and yyprhs)?
The short answer is that we have cases where we construct special parse
trees that contain raw Bison rule numbers and symbol numbers. We cannot
decip
E.g., taking the tables to an architecture where there is no native Bison.
On 6 April 2011 21:06, Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> hi all,
>
> I would really like to know more about your uses of Bison. What kind of use
> can require these tables?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Akim
>
>
___
hi all,
I would really like to know more about your uses of Bison. What kind of use
can require these tables?
Cheers,
Akim
___
help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
I need to weigh in here too. I use Bison in "table-only" mode. Any
change in the table structure would require me to make a corresponding
change in my post processor. Any radical change would mean that I
would be stuck with a downlevel Bison.
On 6 April 2011 14:35, David M. Warme wrote:
>
> Bi
Bison developers,
While examining the "git" repository for bison, I discovered a change
that will be very detrimental to our particular application that makes
extensive use of bison. The relevant change is discussed here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2008-11/msg00291.html
We
