Re: Problem building a reentrant parser

2006-03-05 Thread Bruce Lilly
On Thu February 16 2006 10:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thanks for the response. > > Changing %pure_parser to %pure-parser does not change any of the > behaviour. The compile error message is exactly the same. The > developers seem to have dummy proofed at least this part. > > Any other ideas

Re: Problem building a reentrant parser

2006-02-16 Thread ooklac
Thanks for the response. Changing %pure_parser to %pure-parser does not change any of the behaviour. The compile error message is exactly the same. The developers seem to have dummy proofed at least this part. Any other ideas? ___ Help-bison@gnu.org

Re: Problem building a reentrant parser

2006-02-15 Thread Bob Rossi
> I'm having a problem building a reentrant parser. Here's the simple > test I'm doing, as suggested by the flex documentation. This is using > flex 2.5.31 and bison 2.1 on x86_64 using g++ 4.0.2 on Fedora Core. > Please send any suggestions or help. > > +++ b

Problem building a reentrant parser

2006-02-15 Thread ooklac
Greetings, I'm having a problem building a reentrant parser. Here's the simple test I'm doing, as suggested by the flex documentation. This is using flex 2.5.31 and bison 2.1 on x86_64 using g++ 4.0.2 on Fedora Core. Please send any suggestions or help. +++ begin file slex.l +++