On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Laurence Finston wrote:
> If you only ever delete objects by means of their corresponding
> 'Object_Type::object' pointers, than it would be safe to use simple
> pointers to 'Foo*'.
Sorry, I meant "simple pointers to 'Foo'".
Laurence
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, hz kto wrote:
>
>
> If I have a list like this wouldn't I run into the problem when,
> a parent node deletes some child nodes, then when I come across
> this child in the list, I will crash since it has been deleted already?
That was the point of the following remark:
> > Dep
If I have a list like this wouldn't I run into the problem when,
a parent node deletes some child nodes, then when I come across
this child in the list, I will crash since it has been deleted already?
Ugrading to 2.0 is not easy, since different parts of software are using
Bison, which is slight
