> On 27 Sep 2018, at 15:30, uxio prego wrote:
>
> I suspect builtin [macOS High Sierra] Clang maybe defaults to C89, or needs
> some
> kind of flag in order to use C99?
> By contrast, recent Clang claims to be trying GNU C11 first:
> https://clang.llvm.org/compatibility.html
The both have __S
I suspect builtin [macOS High Sierra] Clang maybe defaults to C89, or needs some
kind of flag in order to use C99?
By contrast, recent Clang claims to be trying GNU C11 first:
https://clang.llvm.org/compatibility.html
:/
However, as long as Bison doesn't use C99, there's no real reason to
use C99
> On 1 Sep 2018, at 19:22, Uxio Prego wrote:
>
> For a couple miscellaneous reasons I have seldom used custom
> installs of (then) newer GCC versions to `/usr/local/`.
>
> If I ever need a newer or more canonical Clang for some reason,
> I'll be sure to remember your words.
One reason to use
For a couple miscellaneous reasons I have seldom used custom
installs of (then) newer GCC versions to `/usr/local/`.
If I ever need a newer or more canonical Clang for some reason,
I'll be sure to remember your words.
Thanks,
> On 1 Sep 2018, at 18:24, Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>
>> On 1 Sep 2018,
> On 1 Sep 2018, at 15:52, Uxio Prego wrote:
>
> Oh, sorry. Code written by me in the action of a production rule
> was causing my problem.
So issue resolved! Note however that you use the Apple inhouse Clang. If you so
like, you might download the real one at [1]. Copy it into say
/usr/loca
Oh, sorry. Code written by me in the action of a production rule
was causing my problem.
Cancel my notice. Deepest apologies.
> On 1 Sep 2018, at 11:54, akim wrote:
>
> Le 2018-08-30 07:47, uxio prego a écrit :
>
> Hi!
>
>> Dear maintainer,
>> I bet you already know that Bison... 2.7 up to...
Hi, sure.
I've added a `bison_20180901` _ref_ at my VCS backups provider:
https://github.com/galegosimpatico/amara/tree/bison_20180901
At that branch my macOS computer is able to reproduce what I just
wrote to you only by ordering `make` (I verified with a clean clone).
Note that the dependen
Le 2018-08-30 07:47, uxio prego a écrit :
Hi!
Dear maintainer,
I bet you already know that Bison... 2.7 up to... 3.1 I think?
Can output a PREFIX.tab.c doc so that when compiled by
LLVM 9 a security warning (see `man 3 printf`) gets
emitted.
No, I am not aware of this. Please, make a complet
Dear maintainer,
I bet you already know that Bison... 2.7 up to... 3.1 I think?
Can output a PREFIX.tab.c doc so that when compiled by
LLVM 9 a security warning (see `man 3 printf`) gets
emitted.
I don't know much about LLVM, but I think they claim to be
GCC compatible. Does Bison in any way claim
