On Wed 05 Jun 2013 12:06:30 AM CEST, Adam Smalin wrote:
During my test to get << a difference precedence then < I suspect it is
impossible because after expr < expr [<] it has no idea if it will be a <<
expr or an < expression thus I can't tell it to have a different precedence
between < and < <
Le 5 juin 2013 à 00:06, Adam Smalin a écrit :
> During my test to get << a difference precedence then < I suspect it is
> impossible because after expr < expr [<] it has no idea if it will be a <<
> expr or an < expression thus I can't tell it to have a different precedence
> between < and < <.
The problem with making >> one token is the problem C++ templates has with
`map>`. I know it can be changed to be something like D
which i think is map!(int, list!(int)) but I'd like to have the option of
doing it in C++ which i may not take.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Valentin Tolmer wrote:
During my test to get << a difference precedence then < I suspect it is
impossible because after expr < expr [<] it has no idea if it will be a <<
expr or an < expression thus I can't tell it to have a different precedence
between < and < <.
Because I can't I wrote this test grammar. When I execu
