Re: bison and downwards compatibility

2006-10-24 Thread Joel E. Denny
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Joerg Hoffmann wrote: > lex.fct_pddl.c:1642: warning: implicit declaration of function ?fileno? Seems like you're missing #include . > scan-fct_pddl.y: In function ?load_fct_file?: > scan-fct_pddl.y:910: error: ?yyin? undeclared (first use in this function) yyin is defined

Re: bison and downwards compatibility

2006-10-24 Thread Joerg Hoffmann
Hi Bob, thanks for the quick answer. Well, now you mention it: right now I got for the first time an error for which I have absolutely no clue what to do, and which I could not resove after some (random) guessing. I just downloaded bison version 1.875 because that is what I used on a previo

Re: bison and downwards compatibility

2006-10-24 Thread Bob Rossi
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 05:38:27PM +0200, Joerg Hoffmann wrote: > Dear Bison makers, > > First, thanks for your very useful tool. However, I have to say I'm > frustrated by the utter lack of downwards compatibility. Why is this > necessary? > > I'm working with code that originated in 1998. It

bison and downwards compatibility

2006-10-24 Thread Joerg Hoffmann
Dear Bison makers, First, thanks for your very useful tool. However, I have to say I'm frustrated by the utter lack of downwards compatibility. Why is this necessary? I'm working with code that originated in 1998. It has in the meantime been copied so often that it is impossible to revise al