> Is there a particular reason that 0**0 is undefined in GMPL? Of course it
> is a reasonable choice to have it like that, but it seems that an as
> reasonable choice is to let it evaluate to 1.
> (Maybe this has been up for discussion before, but I just came across it
> as a problem now...)
0^
Hell Oscar,
see
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00279.html
Best regards
Xypron
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:19:48 +0100 (MET)
> Von: Oscar Gustafsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: help-glpk@gnu.org
> Betreff: [Help-glpk] Ze
Hi!
Is there a particular reason that 0**0 is undefined in GMPL? Of course it
is a reasonable choice to have it like that, but it seems that an as
reasonable choice is to let it evaluate to 1.
(Maybe this has been up for discussion before, but I just came across it
as a problem now...)
Reg