В Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:58:49 -0800
Jordan Uggla пишет:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:29 PM, yannubu...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > - When installing grub-efi (2.00), does it install signed EFI files by
> > default when possible?
> >
> > - I saw some computers with both grubx64.efi and
В Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:51:38 +0200
Oguz Yilmaz пишет:
> Can you provide sample use of search command in grub.conf(unattended). all
> online samples are for attended uses.
>
Oh, sorry, I automatically assumed you are using grub2. I do not think
it is possible in grub legacy.
> On Monday, Novembe
2012/11/26 Jordan Uggla :
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:29 PM, yannubu...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> - When installing grub-efi (2.00), does it install signed EFI files by
>> default when possible?
>>
>> - I saw some computers with both grubx64.efi and shimx64.efi files, i
>> guess the sh
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:29 PM, yannubu...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> - When installing grub-efi (2.00), does it install signed EFI files by
> default when possible?
>
> - I saw some computers with both grubx64.efi and shimx64.efi files, i
> guess the shimx64.efi file is signed but not the
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Oguz Yilmaz wrote:
> I have install grub on to MBR of second disk by "grub-install
> /dev/sdb". It installed succesfully. However when I change the order
> to second disk to simulate, I got: "Error 15: File not found" on grub
> stage.
>
>| root (hd0,0)
Can you provide sample use of search command in grub.conf(unattended). all
online samples are for attended uses.
On Monday, November 26, 2012, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Oguz Yilmaz
wrote:
>>| root (hd0,0)
|
>>| kernel /boot/vmlinuz-3.5.3 ro root=LABE
Richard Owlett wrote:
What would fit best with my habits is that the precedence of
OS to boot would be
"first installed -> first boot choice" *NOT* "last installed
-> first boot choice".
From the responses so far, guess that's not going to happen.
A useful alternative would to replace repla
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/os-prober/+bug/1038093
Regards
Yann
2012/11/26 Leslie S Satenstein
> Hi Yann
>
> Yes, but the problem is not where the mbr points to, but why grub-mkconfig
> does not pick up Fedora distributions.
> I prsume that Debian and Ubuntu use common grub lo
2012/11/26 Leslie S Satenstein
> Felix, you are right, it is multiboot, and if the installation program
> allowed you the option to do as you say, then there would be no problem.
> However, Ubuntu, Mint, did not allow me to choose other than the partition.
> No ability to not modify the mbr. Nev
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Oguz Yilmaz wrote:
>| root (hd0,0)|
>| kernel /boot/vmlinuz-3.5.3 ro root=LABEL=/ console=ttyS0,19200n8|
>| initrd /boot/initrd-3.5.3.img
>
> If I change grub line "root (hd0,0)" to "ro
Hello,
My BIOS has some problems and sometimes boot order of disks changes. I
thought that if I insall grub on to the MBR of second data disk, it
may boot. First disk(sda) is for boot and operating system, second
disk(sdb) is for /var. All partitions are labeled and fsck has labels
as partition re
11 matches
Mail list logo