On 23/04/07, Joseph Wakeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso wrote:
> I don't understand one thing. Why are you compiling, instead of using
> apt-get?
The Ubuntu apt repositories only contain 1.8, I wanted to use 1.9. I'm
not aware of other repositories for GSL ... ?
If the
Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso wrote:
> I don't understand one thing. Why are you compiling, instead of using
> apt-get?
The Ubuntu apt repositories only contain 1.8, I wanted to use 1.9. I'm
not aware of other repositories for GSL ... ?
In any case having started I wanted to understand why what I was
On 23/04/07, Joseph Wakeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've installed gsl 1.9 from source on Ubuntu 7.04 and am having trouble
linking programs with the library.
I don't understand one thing. Why are you compiling, instead of using apt-get?
Curious,
- Jordi G. H.
___
Patrick Alken wrote:
> Put /usr/local/lib in /etc/ld.so.conf and run "ldconfig". Then type
> "ldconfig -v | grep gsl" and make sure its got an entry for libgsl -
> if it does, gcc ... -lgsl -lgslcblas should work fine from any shell.
Thank you very much---exactly what I was looking for!
A big tha
> OK. To be honest I'm not too sure about how these aspects of UNIX work.
> Would this mean that only I can use the shared library, and that I can
> only access it from within the bash shell? Are there any more general
> means for telling the system, "Look in /usr/local/lib as well as /usr/lib"?
At Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:05:58 +0100,
Joseph Wakeling wrote:
> OK. To be honest I'm not too sure about how these aspects of UNIX work.
> Would this mean that only I can use the shared library, and that I can
> only access it from within the bash shell? Are there any more general
> means for tellin
John Pye wrote:
> That works, but it's very naughty. You should only install to /usr
> indirectly, eg by creating an packaged installation such as an RPM or
> DEB file.
Yes, true. There's a nice explanation of why it's a bad idea here:
http://hivelogic.com/narrative/articles/using_usr_local
> A
Joseph Wakeling wrote:
> I tried an alternative route, also with success: when preparing for the
> install, typing,
>
> ./configure --prefix=/usr
> make
> sudo make install
>
> which works without any further ado as this places the library
> where the system expects to find it.
>
That work
John Pye wrote:
> Did you try typing
>
> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:/usr/lib
>
> then running again?
Damn! I knew there was something I'd forgotten.
I tried an alternative route, also with success: when preparing for the
install, typing,
./configure --prefix=/usr
make
sudo make ins
Hi Joseph,
Did you try typing
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:/usr/lib
then running again?
Cheers
JP
Joseph Wakeling wrote:
> I've installed gsl 1.9 from source on Ubuntu 7.04 and am having trouble
> linking programs with the library.
>
> My Makefile includes the use of C flags -I/usr/lo
I've installed gsl 1.9 from source on Ubuntu 7.04 and am having trouble
linking programs with the library.
My Makefile includes the use of C flags -I/usr/local/include and
-L/usr/local/lib along with the library calls -lgsl, -lgslcblas and -lm.
However, when I attempt to run the program I still g
11 matches
Mail list logo
