Re: [Blog/Cookbook?] On multiple Guix profiles and manifests

Hi, Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > Org mode has a Texinfo export library, so I'm thinking I'll do as for my > other blog posts and write them in Org, then export in > > - Markdown for the website; > > - Texinfo for the cookbook. Though maybe we don’t need to have both a blog post and a section in

Re: Next browser looking for init file in store

"LaFreniere\, Joseph" writes: > Thank you for the fast response! I will update and, if I am still > facing any issues, will bring them up in Next-specific venues. > Otherwise, I apologize for spending your time on an already solved > problem. No worries, can't blame you for asking 30

Re: Next browser looking for init file in store

Pierre Neidhardt writes: Actually this is Next-specific ;) Your log shows you are using an old version of Next. Your issue has been fixed on recent versions. updating to current version (1.3.4) should fix it. Thank you for the fast response! I will update and, if I am still facing any

Next browser looking for init file in store

My installation of the Next browser appeared to be ignoring the file I had written in my XDG_CONFIG_HOME (which I have defined as the default "$HOME/.config") at "$HOME/.config/next/init.lisp". Inspecting the *init-file-path* variable from within Next shows a current value

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

* Wilson Bustos [2019-10-10 22:52]: > P, > > And even before this incident, I've seen people say they don't want to > get into free software because of Stallman's behaviour and because people > defend him from any criticism. > So, why didn't you do anything before? why now? If it was a real issue

Re: Thanks

I agree fully. Thank you to Ludo, Ricardo, and the newest maintainers. I appreciate the guix community a lot. - John

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

Dear Jean-Louis, Could you please stop sending messages to the channel? Thanks, PHF Envoyé depuis ProtonMail mobile Message d'origine On 12 oct. 2019 à 14:19, Jean Louis a écrit : > * Quiliro Ordóñez [2019-10-11 01:27]: >> * Ricardo Wurmus [2019-10-10 07:09]: >> > I have

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

Dear P, See my comments below. * P [2019-10-10 22:33]: > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Thursday, October 10, 2019 7:22 PM, Jean Louis wrote: > > > > Your problem is that you published this statement to guix-devel. If you > > > don't mind, I'll forward your mail to gnu-system-discuss,

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

* Quiliro Ordóñez [2019-10-11 01:27]: > * Ricardo Wurmus [2019-10-10 07:09]: > > I have previously asked you privately to stop spamming our mailing > > lists. I am asking you a second time publicly. If you keep disrupting > > our mailing lists your posts will be moderated. > > Censorship is

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

* Vasya Boytsov [2019-10-10 23:03]: > I kindly ask to remove this statement from the Guix site. It's > inappropriate, it's poisonous for the community (you can see this > clearly now). Anyone can have their own opinion in this discussion, > but _PLEASE_ can we divide OS development and politics?

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

* Alexandre François Garreau [2019-10-11 13:53]: > Le jeudi 10 octobre 2019 12:24:35 CEST, vous avez écrit : > > * Alexandre François Garreau [2019-10-10 11:55]: > > > > I don't know how to defend anybody in public by silencing talk. > > > > > > Answering whenever appropriate, currently only

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

Dear Ludovic, Hello, how are you? I was on long travel, could not answer you earlier. * Ludovic Courtès [2019-10-10 16:29]: > Hi Jean-Louis, > > Jean Louis skribis: > > > * Ricardo Wurmus [2019-10-10 07:09]: > >> I have previously asked you privately to stop spamming our mailing > >> lists.

Re: ‘censorship’

* Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> [2019-10-12 11:36]: > David wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 21:11:51 +0300 Dmitry > > Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> You replied privately, offlist. Was it intentional? If yes, why: I see > >> nothing secret there? > > > > Absolutely yes,

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

* Kete via Discussions about the development of the GNU system [2019-10-12 03:28]: > On 10/11/2019 04:43 PM, Alexander Vdolainen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 10/11/19 11:16 PM, Kete via Discussions about the development of the > > GNU system wrote: > >> On 10/10/2019 05:02 PM, Jean Louis wrote: > >

Re: Reminder to remain civil

Jens Mølgaard writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Please keep the language here civil. We don’t need more anger on our >> lists. If you feel frustrated, please take some time off email [...] > > I agree about the language, but I have to say that I share ng0's > sentiment, and I'd like to

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

* Svante Signell [2019-10-10 22:23]: > On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 19:22 +, Jean Louis wrote: > > > > > > > Your problem is that you published this statement to guix-devel. If > > > you don't mind, I'll forward your mail to gnu-system-discuss, which > > > is the appropriate mailing list. > > > >

Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ---> RMS : ?? if you are going to use acronyms unknown to many in the audience, footnote them ! + FUD

* Mancini [2019-10-11 17:31]: > ---> "RMS" : ?? if you are going to use acronyms unknown to > many in the audience, footnote them ! + "FUD" You are right, yes, all text shall be clear. For FUD: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty,_and_doubt Fear, uncertainty, and doubt

Thanks

This is not a question but a thanks for Ludo and all Guix contributors for working on this GNU System Distribution which is critical for Free Software's future and the realization of an advanced GNU OS for the world. Thanks -- Andy Tai, a...@atai.org, Skype: licheng.tai, Line: andy_tai, WeChat: