Updating substitute error: TLS error in the push function

2021-02-15 Thread Todor Kondić
I keep getting this error, --- substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 0.0%guix substitute: error: TLS error in procedure 'write_to_session_record_port': Error in the push function. --- while `sudo guix system reconfigure ...`. Then I get into the whole

inferiors and services

2021-02-15 Thread Todor Kondić
Dear guixians, During the operating system instantiation -- either through `reconfigure`, or various `image` procedures) -- is the only possible way of controlling which version of services and the packages installable by those services to specify a particular commit in the channel config?

Re: help with packaging a common lisp software

2021-02-15 Thread cage
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 07:46:20PM +0100, cage wrote: Hi! > I am trying to package this software: > > https://notabug.org/cage/tinmop/ I kept working on the file and with the help of a friand of mine and insipred by the stumpwm definition package i managed to succeffully compile the

help with packaging a common lisp software

2021-02-15 Thread cage
Hi! I am trying to package this software: https://notabug.org/cage/tinmop/ The program is written in common lisp and it uses both ASDF to build the executable image (using SBCL compiler) and GNU autotools (for i18n files, data files and installation). I am struggling to make guix build

Re: Another Raspberry Pi data point

2021-02-15 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 07:24:36PM -0600, Jonathan Marsden wrote: > > Is anyone currently booting Guix System on a small single board computer that > they can share info about, and ideally share a sample Guix system OS .scm > file > definition for? > Here's a link to my pine64 config. Some

Re: Appimage: cannot run binary file

2021-02-15 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 06:12:52AM +0100, raingloom wrote: > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:43:24 +0100 > Christophe Pisteur wrote: > > > Le jeudi 11 février 2021 à 15:12 +0100, Sergiu Ivanov a écrit : > > > Hi Christophe, > > > > I don't understand all the nuances of this discussion (I'm sorry), > >