Or, just a wild idea: maybe make xspecirl" manifest entries that would modify
Docker image?
This actually would resemble the Dockerfile: name, entrypoint, package installs
and custom script execution is done in one fine, streamlined. It seems a bit
strange for me, for example, to specify things
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 7:18 AM Simon Tournier wrote:
>
> > Maybe then add an option to guix pack to accept optional name? And if not
> > provided, fall back to manifest->friendly-name.
>
> …yes, I agree. It could be nice to be able to directly name the image.
> However, this would mean that the
Hi,
André A. Gomes writes:
> Hi Guix,
>
> When running the command guix-packages-by-name from emacs-guix I get the
> following error:
>
> Starting Guix REPL ... [5 times]
> guix-geiser-eval: Error in evaluating guile expression:
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
> In pro
Hi,
On mer., 18 janv. 2023 at 20:40, Przemysław Kamiński via
wrote:
> that produces cryptic docker image names like bash-coreutils-r-zhs.
Well, this is an improvement compared to the previous behaviour. :-)
See 0074844366381e3056d09492b8b437836c7adb61:
--8<---cut here-
