On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 01:40:14PM +0200, Simon Tournier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 19:16, Saku Laesvuori wrote:
> >> > Running `guix shell --pure ghc-esqueleto -D ghc-bytestring-builder`
> >> > results in an environment that has the base64-bytestring package (from
> >> >
Hello,
Am Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 06:54:35PM +0200 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
> Emmanuel Beffara writes:
> > I don't understand how "out" and "doc" are different in this respect. The
> > "out" output of a collection meta-package has no content of its own and it
> > only serves to gather the "out"
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Emmanuel Beffara writes:
>>> In any case, I suggest to write a proper bug report for this. Hopefully,
>>> someone with better understanding about the implications of GUIX_TEXMF
>>> will be able to solve this.
>>
>> I can do that for the texdoc behaviour.
By the way,
Hi,
On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 19:16, Saku Laesvuori wrote:
>> > Running `guix shell --pure ghc-esqueleto -D ghc-bytestring-builder`
>> > results in an environment that has the base64-bytestring package (from
>> > ghc-base64-bytestring) visible, even though it is not listed on listed
>> > the
Emmanuel Beffara writes:
> I don't understand how "out" and "doc" are different in this respect. The
> "out" output of a collection meta-package has no content of its own and it
> only serves to gather the "out" outputs of its inputs. Similarly, the "doc"
> output would have no content of its
Hello,
Thanks for the instructive feedback!
De Nicolas Goaziou le 28/08/2023 à 13:01:
> Every texlive-* package comes with its documentation, in a separate
> output. "doc" output are not uncommon at all in Guix. Therefore,
> I disagree with the inconsistency you're talking about.
Ok, I admit I
Hello,
Emmanuel Beffara writes:
> Yet, as far as I know, most packages in Guix (apart from texlive-* ones) come
> with their documentation, so it feels somewhat inconsistent.
Every texlive-* package comes with its documentation, in a separate
output. "doc" output are not uncommon at all in
Hello,
De Nicolas Goaziou le 27/08/2023 à 12:13:
> > Apparently, all individual packages have a specific "doc" output but
> > collections and schemes do not and they don't have them as inputs either. So
> > we end up with an installation with no documentation
>
> It sounds like a good default to
Hi Hilton,
Quoting Hilton Chain (2023-08-25 09:34:09)
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 14:59:03 +0800,
> Tanguy LE CARROUR wrote:
> > I have no XDG "log" variable, but the `shepherd.log` in
> > `~/.local/state/log/`
> > contains today's log, so… I guess it can write to the log folder.
> > The strange
