Re: guix pack isolation

2023-02-16 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi, On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 23:56, Kyle Andrews wrote: >> I do not have Singularity at hand, let demo with Docker >> which is very similar. > > Too bad! My system admistrators are against running Docker on the > cluster. The "relocatable" option didn't seem relevant to me since it > wouldn't

Re: guix pack isolation

2023-02-15 Thread Kyle Andrews
Simon Tournier writes: > About squashfs (Singularity container), you can try: > > guix pack -f squashfs python python-numpy bash-minimal -S /bin=bin > > which will produce a compressed squashfs that you then import with > Singularity. This is pretty much what I had tried minus the `-S

Re: guix pack isolation

2023-02-14 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi, On ven., 10 févr. 2023 at 00:25, Kyle Andrews wrote: > I am wondering how I can/should go about isolating containers created > using `guix pack`. Right now they are inheriting configurations from my > personal user folder. > > My system administrators are still quite skeptical about

guix pack isolation

2023-02-09 Thread Kyle Andrews
Dear Guix, I am wondering how I can/should go about isolating containers created using `guix pack`. Right now they are inheriting configurations from my personal user folder. My system administrators are still quite skeptical about installing Guix, but they have made it convenient to submit