Hi,
On ven., 06 janv. 2023 at 10:48, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> I believe distcc would allow sending the workload of individual parts of
> a single package to multiple machines, so a bit finer grained than guix
> offload, which can only send a single package (or more accurately,
> derivation?)
On 2023-01-06, zimoun wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2022 at 18:21, Adam Faiz wrote:
>
>> It's unknown whether implementing usage of distcc and enabling it in
>> `guix build` will affect bit-for-bit reproducibility of packages.
>
> The question is how isolated the distributed computational environments
Hi,
On Sun, 25 Dec 2022 at 18:21, Adam Faiz wrote:
> It's unknown whether implementing usage of distcc and enabling it in
> `guix build` will affect bit-for-bit reproducibility of packages.
The question is how isolated the distributed computational environments
are.
> The distcc feature
curious if distcc can be used for building packages in Guix?
If yes that can reduce the time spent in building significantly.
Currently, guix build doesn't support distcc for distributing individual
source code files for compilation.
However, guix offload can be used to offload the whole build
curious if distcc can be used for building packages in Guix?
If yes that can reduce the time spent in building significantly.
