Wiktor Żelazny writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 09:53:14AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>>
>> Wiktor Żelazny writes:
>>
>> > This sounds rather brittle: you need to keep things in your head.
>>
>> I don’t follow. I don’t see what you’re referring to as “brittl
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 09:53:14AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> Wiktor Żelazny writes:
>
> > This sounds rather brittle: you need to keep things in your head.
>
> I don’t follow. I don’t see what you’re referring to as “brittle” and
> what you need to keep in your head.
When upgrading your p
Wiktor Żelazny writes:
>> There are also good reasons why you wouldn’t want to upgrade your
>> default profile every time you upgrade Guix. Software in your default
>> profile may not actually build with the current version of Guix, or you
>> are perfectly happy with the version you have insta
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 12:22:51PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> There are also good reasons why you wouldn’t want to upgrade your
> default profile every time you upgrade Guix. Software in your default
> profile may not actually build with the current version of Guix, or you
> are perfectly hap
>> Though I have had reports from confused users at work who say that “guix
>> upgrade” doesn’t necessarily help, and that they actually had to use
>> “guix install” on all packages again. I haven’t been able to confirm
>> this yet.
I had that problem, too. It’s why I switched to manifests: I cou
James Smith writes:
> So it seems that guix pull should always be followed by guix package -u ?
No, I don’t think it’s correct to say that. You can use your updated
Guix to do a lot of things that are completely unrelated to the state of
your default profile.
- install things to a different
So it seems that guix pull should always be followed by guix package -u ?
If so, why doesn't guix pull just do the upgrade?
Thanks
Jim
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, January 19th, 2022 at 2:45 PM, Ricardo Wurmus
wrote:
> Wiktor Żelazny w...@freeshell.de writes:
>
> > [[PGP Si
Wiktor Żelazny writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 03:51:35PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>>
>> Wiktor Żelazny writes:
>>
>> > Hey, this sounds just like the problem I reported earlier this
>> > month.
>>
>> Can you please tell us the issue number?
>
> I did not
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 03:51:35PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> Wiktor Żelazny writes:
>
> > Hey, this sounds just like the problem I reported earlier this
> > month.
>
> Can you please tell us the issue number?
I did not file an issue as I wasn’t sure if that was a bug. I’m talking
about the
Wiktor Żelazny writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 12:57:54PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>>
>> jsmith via writes:
>>
>> > ERROR: In procedure dlopen:
>> > In procedure dlopen: file
>> > "/gnu/store/35apwp40n8rnlqyxf7hagwr250nw754w-guile-dbi-2.1.8/lib/libguile-db
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 12:57:54PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> jsmith via writes:
>
> > ERROR: In procedure dlopen:
> > In procedure dlopen: file
> > "/gnu/store/35apwp40n8rnlqyxf7hagwr250nw754w-guile-dbi-2.1.8/lib/libguile-dbi.so",
> > message
> > "/gnu/store/fa6wj5bxkj5ll1d7292a70knmyl7a0cr
jsmith via writes:
> Hi,
> For some code that was previously working I receive the error:
>
> ERROR: In procedure dlopen:
> In procedure dlopen: file
> "/gnu/store/35apwp40n8rnlqyxf7hagwr250nw754w-guile-dbi-2.1.8/lib/libguile-dbi.so",
> message
> "/gnu/store/fa6wj5bxkj5ll1d7292a70knmyl7a0cr-gli
Hi,
For some code that was previously working I receive the error:
ERROR: In procedure dlopen:
In procedure dlopen: file
"/gnu/store/35apwp40n8rnlqyxf7hagwr250nw754w-guile-dbi-2.1.8/lib/libguile-dbi.so",
message "/gnu/store/fa6wj5bxkj5ll1d7292a70knmyl7a0cr-glibc-2.31/lib/libc.so.6:
version `GLI
13 matches
Mail list logo
