Hi,
I just wanted to install HURD on my spare 340Mb Disk (IDE) and I now have a little
(well, it's not that little...) problem:
I ran cross-install from my linux-system and it installed everything without any
problems. I quickly browsed the directories created and eveything looked OK. So I
fired
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 03:04:54PM +0100, David Nowak wrote:
> That is too early. I mean this is a serious problem that people are
> interested in Hurd NOW because they could be seriously disappointed by its
> current inefficiency. Disk access is so slow! I hope it will be
> improved and I
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 09:17:57PM +0200, Jan Atle Ramsli wrote:
> What I'm trying to say, is that I have _NO___I_D_E_A how to get my updates from me
>to (???)
For all development issues, like if you have a patch or contribution or
specific questions that help you achieving such, mail [EMAIL PRO
> Note that both OSF and NT are based on Mach technology
Just to disturb an urban legend: Windows NT is *not* based on Mach
technology.
Regards,
Martin
At 12:51 19.4.2000 -0500, Neal H Walfield wrote:
>> That is too early. I mean this is a serious problem that people are
>> interested in Hurd NOW because they could be seriously disappointed by its
>> current inefficiency. Disk access is so slow! I hope it will be
>> improved and I wonder
Chris Lingard wrote:
>
> Jeff Bailey wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 07:15:26PM +0200, Jan Atle Ramsli wrote:
> >
> > > Jeff Bailey was mentioned - is he the 'Doc'-man?
> >
> > Not exactly. I'm trying to collect documentation to form sort of a
> > "Hurd-HOWTO" site. My biggest interest is
Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 07:15:26PM +0200, Jan Atle Ramsli wrote:
>
> > Jeff Bailey was mentioned - is he the 'Doc'-man?
>
> Not exactly. I'm trying to collect documentation to form sort of a
> "Hurd-HOWTO" site. My biggest interest is for helping do-it-yourselfers,
> but I'
> That is too early. I mean this is a serious problem that people are
> interested in Hurd NOW because they could be seriously disappointed by its
> current inefficiency. Disk access is so slow! I hope it will be
> improved and I wonder why it is so inefficient. Any idea ?
There are too m
> > Has anybody else noticed the increase in the amount of emails this list is
>receiving?I am seeing
> > an increase in traffic on the freebsd-questions list also. It is almost like linux
>is not cool
> > anymore andpeople are looking for the next "underground OS".
>
> That's probably part of
