Re: 4th set of permission bits?

2000-12-02 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 02:59:24PM -0300, Ivan Jager wrote: > > I am also saying that those goals ar enot orthogonal. The Hurd is flexible ^^ That should say exclusive Ooops. > > enough to carry both. And, as a last note, the fourthe set of pe

Re: 4th set of permission bits?

2000-12-02 Thread Ivan Jager
Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 05:03:18PM -0300, Ivan Jager wrote: > > Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:14:47PM -0300, Ivan Jager wrote: > > > > IMHO, the best solution would be to drop the last set of permissions and > > > > port the ACL patch f

Re: 4th set of permission bits?

2000-12-02 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 02:31:20PM +0800, Robert Marlow wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hmm... I keep reading over and over and I don't see how my idea doesn't > > > work... maybe an example and you can show me where it is flawed. > > > > > > say a file begins wi

Re: 4th set of permission bits?

2000-12-02 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 05:03:18PM -0300, Ivan Jager wrote: > Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:14:47PM -0300, Ivan Jager wrote: > > > IMHO, the best solution would be to drop the last set of permissions and > > > port the ACL patch for Linux from http://acl.bestbits.at/