Re: preferred order of owner, group, author in GNU/Hurd ls -l output?

2002-05-19 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
* Marcus Brinkmann writes: > As far as I know, the desired behaviour is for cp to retain the author > field. This means that if you cp a file you are not an author of, the new > file would have your uid as owner and the original file's author's uid > as author. I am waiting for Jim (Meyering) to

Re: preferred order of owner, group, author in GNU/Hurd ls -l output?

2002-05-19 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 03:38:49PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > which order should the author, owner, and group be listed? I think that as most people read terminal output from left to right, and they are used to seeing first the owner, than the group. tolerating a another user name after that is

Re: preferred order of owner, group, author in GNU/Hurd ls -l output?

2002-05-19 Thread Victor Pelt
to me it makes sence to do the owner:group:author format since the owner is the most important person, he owns the file after that i think the groups comes in terms of inportance especially since there 2 also are used in the file permission field. the autor should come last since it is extra info