Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Miguel wrote:
>> So, the only thing I can do is to try to figure out what the problem is
>> by myself?
>
> You'd better give up from using GNU Mach 2, unless you can afford to spend many
> ours debugging it via serial link. Or you can try another compute
Miguel wrote:
So, the only thing I can do is to try to figure out what the problem is
by myself?
You'd better give up from using GNU Mach 2, unless you can afford to
spend many ours debugging it via serial link. Or you can try another
computer, but there is probability that it will be signficant
Thanks Marcus.
So, this way is the L4 really the next
(best?) choice to a microkernel for
the Hurd?
Bruno.
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:31:47AM -0300, brunoacf wrote:
> > There is some effort to implement
> > virtual filesystems like procfs and
> > devfs into the Hurd? Sometime ago I
> > saw a d
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:31:47AM -0300, brunoacf wrote:
> There is some effort to implement
> virtual filesystems like procfs and
> devfs into the Hurd? Sometime ago I
> saw a discussion about "Hurd do not
> need procfs" in the mailing lists but
> I still believe it would be a good
> improvement.
> X-Spam-Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] by digitalanswers.org
> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 19:30:50 +0100 (BST)
> From: Greg Buchholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,DIFFERENT_RE
Harrison Bello
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not be apprehensive by this mail as I humbly seek YOUR PATIENCE,
UNDERSTANDING and COOPERATION in regard to my below plight. Once again, do
not be apprehensive considering its magnitude and the fact that we have not
meet before.
I am contacting
