Re: L4 instead of gnumach?

2000-10-30 Thread Erik Verbruggen
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 06:28:41PM +0100, Niels Möller wrote: > Erik Verbruggen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Ok, I think the L4 stuff needs a bit of background. Special for Niels: I > > started doing a Sparc port, but there were some problems which are > > si

Re: L4 instead of gnumach?

2000-10-30 Thread Erik Verbruggen
*long explanation alert* Ok, I think the L4 stuff needs a bit of background. Special for Niels: I started doing a Sparc port, but there were some problems which are similair to those that the Alpha port has, so that's why I react. (oh, and I have an Alpha, so I'm also interested in the Alpha p

Re: [Hurd-alpha-devel] Re: L4 instead of gnumach?

2000-10-30 Thread Erik Verbruggen
won't devote myself to L4 until I finish the remaining > tasks for GRUB 1.0, though...) Now you talk about Grub :-) Alpha still needs a multiboot loader (well, I can't find one). L4 is loaded as raw image on Alpha at the moment. I don't know if you have access to an Alpha, b

Re: some novice problems

2000-09-28 Thread Erik Verbruggen
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 04:55:15PM +0200, Jean Schurger wrote: > - where can i found gnumach-dev ? probably in the devel dir > - can i find ssh already packages for hurd ? Not as far as I know. OpenSSH has some issues with the random number stuff and I haven't tried any other ssh im

Re: micro and macrokernel

2000-06-20 Thread Erik Verbruggen
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 02:29:24PM -0500, Neal H Walfield wrote: [snip] > They question then is why does not everyone use > microkernels? Well, they are very slow because a lot of the time is spent in > context switching (since all drivers are now in userspace and are not simple > procedure cal