Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't know how to implement ACLs in the Hurd.
I imagine there are several somewhat independent parts of that:
1. Storing the acls on disk. The ext2 (or whatever filesystem is
used) server has to do that.
2. Enforcing the ACL when making acces
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 02:59:24PM -0300, Ivan Jager wrote:
> > I am also saying that those goals ar enot orthogonal. The Hurd is flexible
^^ That should say exclusive
Ooops.
> > enough to carry both. And, as a last note, the fourthe set of pe
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 05:03:18PM -0300, Ivan Jager wrote:
> > Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:14:47PM -0300, Ivan Jager wrote:
> > > > IMHO, the best solution would be to drop the last set of permissions and
> > > > port the ACL patch f
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 02:31:20PM +0800, Robert Marlow wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > > Hmm... I keep reading over and over and I don't see how my idea doesn't
> > > work... maybe an example and you can show me where it is flawed.
> > >
> > > say a file begins wi
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 05:03:18PM -0300, Ivan Jager wrote:
> Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:14:47PM -0300, Ivan Jager wrote:
> > > IMHO, the best solution would be to drop the last set of permissions and
> > > port the ACL patch for Linux from http://acl.bestbits.at/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> > Hmm... I keep reading over and over and I don't see how my idea doesn't
> > work... maybe an example and you can show me where it is flawed.
> >
> > say a file begins with the permissions following:
> >
> > rwxr-xr-xr-x
> >
> > ie, the last 3 b
Neal H Walfield wrote:
>
> > > > IMHO, the best solution would be to drop the last set of permissions and
> > > > port the ACL patch for Linux from http://acl.bestbits.at/ :) How hard
> > > > would that be?
>
> The issue here is that you have admitted to knowing nothing about either of
> them: w
> > > IMHO, the best solution would be to drop the last set of permissions and
> > > port the ACL patch for Linux from http://acl.bestbits.at/ :) How hard
> > > would that be?
The issue here is that you have admitted to knowing nothing about either of
them: who are you then to say what is better
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:14:47PM -0300, Ivan Jager wrote:
> > IMHO, the best solution would be to drop the last set of permissions and
> > port the ACL patch for Linux from http://acl.bestbits.at/ :) How hard
> > would that be?
>
> Show us.
If you mean you want me
To be honest, I just heard about that patch a few days ago. I havn't
even tried it yet. I hope is isn't to specific to Linux.
Robert Marlow wrote:
> Actually I discussed this whole permissions thing with Jim Meyering and
> that's what he suggested. I haven't looked further into it yet though. Do
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:14:47PM -0300, Ivan Jager wrote:
> IMHO, the best solution would be to drop the last set of permissions and
> port the ACL patch for Linux from http://acl.bestbits.at/ :) How hard
> would that be?
Show us.
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Actually I discussed this whole permissions thing with Jim Meyering and
that's what he suggested. I haven't looked further into it yet though. Do
you know much about ACL? It's a completely new concept to me (actually,
this whole thing's new but I gott
IMHO, the best solution would be to drop the last set of permissions and
port the ACL patch for Linux from http://acl.bestbits.at/ :) How hard
would that be?
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 08:05:38PM +0800, Robert Marlow wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 08:05:38PM +0800, Robert Marlow wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hmm... I keep reading over and over and I don't see how my idea doesn't
> work... maybe an example and you can show me where it is flawed.
>
> say a file begins with the permissio
here is something I'm still missing, please show
me the counterexample of why what I'm thinking wouldn't work.
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 12:13:16 +0100
> From: Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Robert Marlow <[EMAIL P
15 matches
Mail list logo
