I concur. The word "vision" means different things to different people, but
"direction" may be more down-to-earth. I think it'll end up being a list
where possible applications for the Hurd are discussed. Possibly it will
include rationale, method, and problems.
At 01:02 AM 4/11/00 -0400, you
On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 01:02:07AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Jeff Bailey wrote:
>
> > Is hurd-vision a good name for multimedia discussion? (Any dissentors?
> > anyone care?)
>
> Is the focus of this new list multimedia only? I thought the direction was
> broader
On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Is hurd-vision a good name for multimedia discussion? (Any dissentors?
> anyone care?)
Is the focus of this new list multimedia only? I thought the direction was
broader than that.
hurd-vision would be ok, but it sort of implies pie-in-the-sky ideals
Hi,
I feel that we hardly need yet another list. There are currently
two low volume general discussion lists for the hurd: debian-hurd
and help-hurd.
Can we justify another list on a topic that has generated ten emails
to date? I do not think so. If in a month this thread still has
a reasonab
> If any of those projects are destined to become 'GNU', they
> are welcome on subversions. Subversions will have a full sourceforge
> frontend shortly.
>
> Whenever possible, I think we should try and keep things near
> to the GNU servers and the Debian project - that way newbies (and old
>
On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 02:55:07PM -0700, Brent Fulgham wrote:
> > Therefore I'd like to ask if anyone would be interested in an list
> > setup on a commercial list server?
> >
> > We'd have to suffer adverts but we won't have to hassle GNU or load
> > their machines with the discussion.
> >
> >
On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 09:26:40PM +0100, Nic Ferrier wrote:
> >I think you're right. We need a [EMAIL PROTECTED] list :)
>
> Therefore I'd like to ask if anyone would be interested in an list
> setup on a commercial list server?
>
> We'd have to suffer adverts but we won't have to hassle GNU
> Therefore I'd like to ask if anyone would be interested in an list
> setup on a commercial list server?
>
> We'd have to suffer adverts but we won't have to hassle GNU or load
> their machines with the discussion.
>
> If people want it I'll set one up.
Marcus Brinkman and I started to set up
>>> Gerald Gutierrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10-Apr-00 10:23:19 PM
>>>
At 08:48 PM 4/10/00 +0100, Nic Ferrier wrote:
>>Of course, we should really do that on another list (but they're
easy
>>to setup these days if we're prepared to accept adverts).
>I think you're right. We need a [EMAIL PROTECTED
