Hello Marcus,
> >2. There are other Mach implementations besides gnumach with a
> > richer or different set of features. Besides using the Hurd
> > as main OS-Server on top of those Mach(s), one could also use
> > the Hurd as 2nd OS-Server, in
On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 01:59:58AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> >3. Integrating the latest version of the Linux device drivers
> > to the Hurd should be further investigated,
> > probably by moving them into user-land.]
>
> I think this is orthogonal to
Hi Farid,
without wanting to harm the essential message of your mail, I have two
comments.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 12:49:37AM +0200, Farid Hajji wrote:
>2. There are other Mach implementations besides gnumach with a
> richer or different set of features. Besides using t
Abstract: [1. Keep the Hurd interface(s) to Mach as portable as possible,
so that most/each Mach implementation can be used.
2. There are other Mach implementations besides gnumach with a
richer or different set of features. Besides using the Hurd
