Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 01:24:13PM +0200, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
> > 1.
> > How accurate are 1987-1989 CMU Mach papers if GNU Mach is considered.
>
> Depends entirely on what specific issue you look at.
> For example, the Hurd has no nameserver,
On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 02:45:44AM +0900, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
> From: Tomasz Wegrzanowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Some Hurd and Mach programming questions
> Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 18:37:04 +0200
>
> > How much of IPCing really needs MIG and
> > co
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 02:28:14PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> I don't know what "current" means to you, though. All Hurd servers are
> multithreaded and usually serve multiple users/processes.
Reading Marks reply, I am enlightened. Forget this part of my message :)
Marcus
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 01:24:13PM +0200, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
> 1.
> How accurate are 1987-1989 CMU Mach papers if GNU Mach is considered.
Depends entirely on what specific issue you look at.
For example, the Hurd has no nameserver, but it has (still)
cthreads, and the client/server basics
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 13:24:13 +0200
From: Tomasz Wegrzanowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mach/MIG related :
1.
How accurate are 1987-1989 CMU Mach papers if GNU Mach is considered.
I'm not entirely sure. Some of these papers are probably discussing
things about Mach 2.5 and may be
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 02:19:40PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 13:24:13 +0200
>From: Tomasz Wegrzanowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Mach/MIG related :
>
>3.
>How good is MIG ?
>What special, non-obvious features are really in use if
>compared to
From: Tomasz Wegrzanowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Some Hurd and Mach programming questions
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 18:37:04 +0200
> How much of IPCing really needs MIG and
> couldn't be done by some set cpp macros or other way that
> don't need inventing a new la
Mach/MIG related :
1.
How accurate are 1987-1989 CMU Mach papers if GNU Mach is considered.
2.
Are filesystem protocol and other basic client-to-server protocols
hard-coded in Mach or reside completely in Hurd ?
3.
How good is MIG ?
What special, non-obvious features are really in use if
compar
