On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:01:14AM -0300, brunoacf wrote:
So, this way is the L4 really the next
(best?) choice to a microkernel for
the Hurd?
Yes, I think so, and many others as well. The many reasons for that
will have to be written down at some point, but between the obvious ones
(faster,
Thanks Marcus.
So, this way is the L4 really the next
(best?) choice to a microkernel for
the Hurd?
Bruno.
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:31:47AM -0300, brunoacf wrote:
There is some effort to implement
virtual filesystems like procfs and
devfs into the Hurd? Sometime ago I
saw a
Hi,
There is some effort to implement
virtual filesystems like procfs and
devfs into the Hurd? Sometime ago I
saw a discussion about Hurd do not
need procfs in the mailing lists but
I still believe it would be a good
improvement.
Thanks.
