Re: cross compilation tool versions

2000-03-20 Thread Daniel Wagner
On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Colin Walters wrote: > What versions of the various GNU tools do people use for a cross > compilation environment from GNU/Linux? I'm not sure if this helps, but do not use binutils > 2.9.5.0.24 For more details: http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/bug-glibc/2000-02/msg6

Re: cross compilation tool versions

2000-03-20 Thread Jim Franklin
OK OK I get the hint. I'll get off my lazy butt and contribute :) This is going to be a brand spanking new adventure for me since I've never attempted anything like this before. Unfortunately I'm only going to be able to do it on weekends because of a big project I'm involved in at work. So pl

Re: cross compilation tool versions

2000-03-20 Thread Roland McGrath
> Excellent! I knew this was true for regular GNUMach, but I wasn't sure > if oskit-mach was the same or produced files that had to run either on > the target or the host. This will help me alot. Just like gnumach, oskit-mach builds one final result: an ELF multiboot kernel. The oskit just p

Re: cross compilation tool versions

2000-03-20 Thread Roland McGrath
> I need to go through the effort of figuring out how to setup OSKit && > GNUMach. Once that is done, I will change the instructions so that egcs > isn't used at all. (Contributions welcome!! any other 'help documentation that people want posted'>). For oskit and gnumach (and oskit-mach) you

Re: cross compilation tool versions

2000-03-20 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 11:50:49AM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote: > > I need to go through the effort of figuring out how to setup OSKit && > > GNUMach. Once that is done, I will change the instructions so that egcs > > isn't used at all. (Contributions welcome!! > any other 'help documentation

Re: cross compilation tool versions

2000-03-20 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 08:19:05AM -0700, Jim Franklin wrote: Thanks. egcs ought to work for the entire process - I chose to use the most recent compiler for 2 reasons: 1) There were some significant improvements in the cross-compiler stuff in the 2.95 series. This is not particularily impor

Re: cross compilation tool versions

2000-03-20 Thread Jim Franklin
Hi Jeff I really like your page on cross compilation. Is there any reason to not use egcs 1.1.2 for the entire process? Jim Jeff Bailey wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 10:11:43PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > > I have documented what works for me at http://hurd.zugzug.com/ - The only > c

Re: cross compilation tool versions

2000-03-19 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 10:11:43PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: I have documented what works for me at http://hurd.zugzug.com/ - The only change I recommend from those is to update to Glibc 2.1.3, and that the latest Hurd CVS can now be compiled with gcc 2.95.2. I will update the instructions t

cross compilation tool versions

2000-03-19 Thread Colin Walters
What versions of the various GNU tools do people use for a cross compilation environment from GNU/Linux? i.e. should I try using the latest GCC? Or would it be better to stick with 2.7.2.3? Are there any problems with the latest binutils? Knowing what is a currently working set will probably