On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:40 -0700, micron_make wrote:
> In one of my make make files I do the following:
> files_path=$(abspath $(wildcard ../src/*.c))
> filt=$(subst /, ,$(files_path))
> mod_name_filter=$(filter Module_%,$(filt))
> MODULE_NAME=$(mod_name_filter)
Weird, but OK. I really, really t
Paul Smith-20 wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 00:15 -0700, micron_make wrote:
>> I have variable whose value will be evaluated at the beginning. I need
>> to paste this value (not the variable name). I do not want to
>> reference the variable, since the usage requires the value to be
>> pasted.
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 19:09 +0200, Torsten Mohr wrote:
> In a large project we have the sources organised in several subdirectories,
> for example:
>
> SRC := some/where/main.c a/directory/gui.c some/where/else/stuff.c
>
> VPATH := some/where a/directoy some/where/else
>
> BASENAMES := $(patsub
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 10:33 -0500, David A. Greene wrote:
> Simple question: when make tries to rebuild makefiles (included .mk
> files, for example), does it do so in parallel if -j was specified?
Yes. The rebuild of makefiles is in every way identical to all other
make rule processing: make sim
Hi,
> I treat my dependency files exactly the same as my object files, so I
> keep them in a separate tree. If you prefer to keep your object files in
> the source tree I'd just put my dependency files in the source tree too.
>
> I don't have a separate step to create the dependency info either.
>
On Tuesday 31 July 2007 08:19, Paul Smith wrote:
> There is a GSoC project underway right now which will add a feature of
> "user definable out of date detection"; this should allow users to use
> md5sum or other advanced criteria for determining when files are out of
> date.
Oooh, that'd be real
Simple question: when make tries to rebuild makefiles (included .mk files, for
example), does it do so in parallel if -j was specified?
-Dave
___
Help-make mailing list
Help-make@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.o
On Monday 30 July 2007 21:18, David A. Greene wrote:
> On Monday 30 July 2007 17:39, Paul Smith wrote:
> > There is no other way to do it than wildcard. As long as you're testing
> > for the existence of a TARGET file (that is declared a target in the
> > makefile and only updated through the ausp
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 00:15 -0700, micron_make wrote:
> I have variable whose value will be evaluated at the beginning. I need
> to paste this value (not the variable name). I do not want to
> reference the variable, since the usage requires the value to be
> pasted. Is there way to do it in the m
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 09:55 +0200, Torsten Mohr wrote:
> as i understand it the resolution of the timestamps of files is 1 second.
> Is this sufficient for "make" to work correctly? Especially as nowadays
> PCs get more and more powerful? Is it possible that problems can occur
> from that?
Make
Hi,
I have variable whose value will be evaluated at the beginning. I need to
paste this value (not the variable name). I do not want to reference the
variable, since the usage requires the value to be pasted.
Is there way to do it in the make framework?
Cheers!!
--
View this message in context:
On 2007-07-31 11:28:06 (+0200), Torsten Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [for generating the dependencies]
>
> > It there any reason you can't use the full path, or at least the path
> > relative to the root of your project directory?
>
> I also thought about the two possibilities:
>
>
Hi,
[for generating the dependencies]
> It there any reason you can't use the full path, or at least the path
> relative to the root of your project directory?
I also thought about the two possibilities:
1. have the same folder structure for the dependencies as for the sources
2. create the de
On 2007-07-31 09:57:09 (+0200), Torsten Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in a project in the office we store the list of files in a variable and
> use automatic dependency generation.
>
> I generate the name of the dependency file for the sources from the basename
> of the files and prep
Hi,
in a project in the office we store the list of files in a variable and
use automatic dependency generation.
I generate the name of the dependency file for the sources from the basename
of the files and prepend a different directory. This way
"some/where/on/disk/main.c" becomes "dependencies
Hi,
as i understand it the resolution of the timestamps of files is 1 second.
Is this sufficient for "make" to work correctly? Especially as nowadays
PCs get more and more powerful? Is it possible that problems can occur
from that?
Another question, i heard that on some windows systems a file t
16 matches
Mail list logo
