Ok. Then this is what I was able to make of it. To be honest, I prefer the Makefile syntax over the script syntax, because of its direct substitutions.
Other improvements that anyone likes to suggest? Is this the best bash can
do?
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 3:47 AM Martin D Kealey <mar...@kurahaupo.gen.nz>
wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2024, Mischa Baars wrote:
>
> > Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:52:16
> > From: Mischa Baars <mjbaars1977.bac...@gmail.com>
> > To: alex xmb sw ratchev <fxmb...@gmail.com>
> > Cc: psm...@gnu.org, bug-bash <bug-b...@gnu.org>, help-make@gnu.org
> > Subject: Re: multi-threaded compiling
> >
> > I found another mistake of mine:
> >
> > #ifndef __STRINGIZED__
> >
> > should be
> >
> > #if __STRINGIZED__ == 0
> >
> > or it will always go for the second statement in the conditional.
> >
> > Can someone please correct my script??? Things are starting to itch.
>
> The fundamental limitation is that Bash only provides lists of scalars
> masquerading as arrays, and lists of scalar-scalar pairs masquerading as
> maps (aka hashes, dicts, or "associative arrays").
>
> It does not support any more complex data structures, and in particular,
> does not have arrays-of-arrays or lists-of-lists.
>
> So I would change
>
> CFLAGS[0]="-D__STRINGIZED__=0 -D__STRING__=\"${STR[0]}\""
> CFLAGS[1]="-D__STRINGIZED__=0 -D__STRING__=\"${STR[1]}\""
> CFLAGS[2]="-D__STRINGIZED__=1 -D__STRING__=\"${STR[0]}\""
> CFLAGS[3]="-D__STRINGIZED__=1 -D__STRING__=\"${STR[1]}\""
>
> to
>
> CFLAGS0=( -D__STRINGIZED__=0 -D__STRING__="${STR[0]}" )
> CFLAGS1=( -D__STRINGIZED__=0 -D__STRING__="${STR[1]}" )
> CFLAGS2=( -D__STRINGIZED__=1 -D__STRING__="${STR[0]}" )
> CFLAGS3=( -D__STRINGIZED__=1 -D__STRING__="${STR[1]}" )
>
> and then change
>
> gcc -o main main.c ${CFLAGS[0]} ; ./main
> gcc -o main main.c ${CFLAGS[1]} ; ./main
> gcc -o main main.c ${CFLAGS[2]} ; ./main
> gcc -o main main.c ${CFLAGS[3]} ; ./main
>
> to
>
> gcc -o main main.c "${CFLAGS0[@]}" && ./main
> gcc -o main main.c "${CFLAGS1[@]}" && ./main
> gcc -o main main.c "${CFLAGS2[@]}" && ./main
> gcc -o main main.c "${CFLAGS3[@]}" && ./main
>
> If you absolutely must have some kind one indexed array for all the
> permutations of cflags, then you could use a synthetic multidimensional
> array, like this:
>
> CFLAGS=( -D__STRINGIZED__=0 -D__STRING__="${STR[0]}"
> -D__STRINGIZED__=0 -D__STRING__="${STR[1]}"
> -D__STRINGIZED__=1 -D__STRING__="${STR[0]}"
> -D__STRINGIZED__=1 -D__STRING__="${STR[1]}" )
>
> gcc -o main main.c "${CFLAGS[@]:0*2:2}" && ./main
> gcc -o main main.c "${CFLAGS[@]:1*2:2}" && ./main
> gcc -o main main.c "${CFLAGS[@]:2*2:2}" && ./main
> gcc -o main main.c "${CFLAGS[@]:3*2:2}" && ./main
>
> However, given the pattern, I'd have gone with:
>
> for i in 0 1 2 3 ; do
> gcc -o main main.c -D__STRINGIZED__=$((i/2))
> -D__STRING__="${STR[i%2]}" &&
> ./main
> done
>
> -Martin
>
make.sh
Description: application/shellscript
/* * * *
* :set tabstop=9
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#define str(x) lit(x)
#define lit(x) #x
#if __STRINGIZED__ == 0
const char* s = __STRING__ ;
#else
const char* s = str(__STRING__);
#endif
int main ()
{
printf ("STRINGIZED: %d, STRING: %s\n", __STRINGIZED__, s);
}
Makefile
Description: Binary data
